Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Welfare Chart in the USA ever Increasing

 

The national debt as a percentage of the gross domestic product

 
The national debt as a percentage of the gross domestic product
 
 
 
 
 
US Total Government Debt Since 1900
 
 
 
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/us_national_debt_chart.html


At the beginning of the 20th century debt was equally divided between federal and state and local debt, totaling less than 20 percent of GDP. After World War I, the total debt surged to 45% of GDP. But by the mid 1920s debt had declined to below 35 percent of GDP. Then came the Great Depression, boosting total public debt to 70 percent of GDP. World War II boosted federal debt to almost 122 percent of GDP in 1946, with state and local debt adding another 7 percent. For the next 35 years successive governments brought the debt below 50 percent of GDP, but President Reagan increased the federal debt up over 50 perent of GDP, and total debt towards 70 perent to win the Cold War. President Bush increased the debt to fight a war on terror and bail out the banks in the crisis of 2008.

Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Economic Data Web Sites

See how the economy has changed since Obama was elected in 2008.

Jobs

2008200920102011January
2012
April/May
2012
Unemployment rate5%7.8%9.7%9.1%8.3%8.2%
Broader unemployment rate "U-6"9.2%14.2%16.7%16.1%15.1%14.8%
White unemployment rate4.4%7.1%8.7%8.1%7.4%7.4%
Black unemployment rate9.1%12.7%16.5%15.7%13.6%13.6%
Hispanic unemployment rate6.5%10%12.6%12%10.5%11%
Total private-sector jobs115.6 M111 M106.8 M108.2 M110.5 M111 M
Total government jobs22.4 M22.6 M22.5 M22.2 M22 M22 M
Median weeks unemployed910.720.121.721.120.1

Income

2008200920102011January
2012
April/May
2012
Yearly GDP$13.2 T$12.7 T$13.1 T$13.3 T--$13.5 T
Disposable personal income per capita$33,229$32,166$32,481$32,667--$32,677
Personal bankruptcies1,074,2251,412,8381,536,7991,362,847----
Poverty rate12.5%13.2%14.3%15.1%----
People receiving food stamps--32 M39 M44 M46 M46 M

Prices

2008200920102011January
2012
April/May
2012
Overall inflation4.3%0%2.6%1.6%2.9%2.3%
Food and beverage inflation4.8%5.2%-0.4%1.8%4.4%3.1%
Loaf of white bread$1.32$1.40$1.36$1.40$1.42--
Pound of ground chuck$2.78$2.99$2.84$3.07$3.32--
Gallon of milk$3.84$3.34$3.21$3.39$3.53--
Pound of apples$1.28$1.11$1.07$1.13$1.18--
Pound of sugar$0.51$0.57$0.63$0.66$0.71--
Gasoline prices$3.16$1.74$2.72$3.12$3.36$3.73
Residential natural gas per unit$12.24$12.49$10.56$9.79$9.55$9.40




http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/jun/01/scorecard-economy-obama/
http://www.politifact.com/

Inflation Chart and Unemployment in USA Since 2007 and 2008




http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2012/10/inflation-and-unemployment.html


 
 
 

Sunday, December 23, 2012

Social Security for Low Income Propels the Economy through Dollar Multiplier

Yes. President Bush has repeatedly said that those who put their money in private accounts are "guaranteed" a better return than they'll receive from the current Social Security system. But every sale of stock on the stock market includes the disclaimer: "the return on this investment is not guaranteed and may be negative"--for good reason. During the 20th century, there were several periods lasting more than 10 years where the return on stocks was negative. After the Dow Jones stock index went down by over 75% between 1929 and 1933, the Dow did not return to its 1929 level until 1953. In claiming that the rate of return on a stock investment is guaranteed to be greater than the return on any other asset, Bush is lying. If an investment-firm broker made this claim to his clients, he would be arrested and charged with stock fraud. Michael Milken went to jail for several years for making just this type of promise about financial investments.

In fact, under the most likely version of the Bush privatization proposal, a 20-year old worker joining the labor force today would see her guaranteed Social Security benefits reduced by 46%. Bush's own Social Security commission admitted that private accounts are unlikely to make up for this drop in guaranteed benefits. The brokerage firm Goldman Sachs estimates that even with private accounts, retirement income of younger workers would be reduced by 42% compared to what they would receive if no changes are made to Social Security.


http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2005/0505orr.html